Adoption Network Law Center Adoption Network Law Center
Click Here to be helped in California!
Adoption Network Law Center
Adoption Network Law Center
Pregnant? Click Here
Adoption Network Law Center
Older Parent Adoption Blog

04/04/07

Moms: To work, or not to work

Posted by : Sandra Hanks Benoiton in Older Parent Adoption Blog at 04:59 am , 466 words, 298 views  
Categories: Decisions, Choices and other tough stuff
Being a full-time mother is one of the highest salaried jobs in my field, since the payment is pure love. ~Mildred B. Vermont

That may be all well and good, but love don't put toast on the table, as good old Granny Gladys used to say. Many of us need to be gainfully employed. Whether we're working hard for the money, or fulfilling needs to express ourselves, fly with our own wings ... whatever ... a lot of mothers have jobs.

As older mothers, it's likely that some of us have established our careers, climbed the ladders we were inclined to climb and come to the parenting thing later rather than sooner. As adoptive parents, motherhood didn't sneak up and catch us in mid-promotion-quest, but was bestowed only at the end of a very long and well-planned path. Neither scenario automatically conveys the title, SAHM ... Stay At Home Mom.

SPONSOR
  Adopt in California

Like so much in the adoption world, or the world in general to be more accurate, differences equal divisions that add up to friction, so SAHMs and working mothers can be found duking it out over who's doing the right thing.

A discussion has been going on for ages on the forums here ... pros, cons, amateurs, stay-at-homes, work-at-homes, work-out-of-the homes, full timers, part timers, all taking a stance and defending positions, pleasantly thankfully, and eventually agreeing that, "It really can be a grass is greener conundrum; sometimes SAHM's wanna get away and sometimes WOHM's wanna be home."

It's not all "make nice" when it comes to the debate, however. There's a much bigger set of issues than who'll pay for daycare.

"The Feminine Mistake: Are We Giving Up Too Much", a book about the risks of economic dependency and the benefits of work for women, brought a world of criticism down on the head of the author, Leslie Bennets, that she called, "an avalanche of blistering attacks by women who hadn't read my book but couldn't wait to condemn it."

Full time moms who rightly consider their years at home with the kids the best they'll ever have, and the most valuable contribution they will ever make toward the good of the world, wouldn't trade that time for all the premium blend java in the corner office with the view AND a six-figure income.Some are strident in their insistence that mothering requires focused devotion and children are deserving of nothing less.

Others may agree in principle, but choose to wrap the issue in a big package ... and being mothers they not only wrap that package, but pack it properly, tape all the edges down, address it correctly, haul it to the post office, insure it and send it registered mail, careful to file the receipt and jot down the estimated date of arrival. Yep. Moms are organized.

Continued ...

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: AdrienneBashista [Member] Email
Hey Sandra - there's a great discussion of this book on Salon this week - especially interesting are the letters about the review.
As someone who's recently re-entered the out-of-the-house work force I have to say I really, really miss the flexibility of working/momming at home. At the same time I am making a HECK of a lot more money working out of the house, not to mention the health insurance that comes with working for someone else.
Now, I haven't read the book, but I think she has an important point about considering the financial side of lost income when deciding to stay at home. If I had kept working outside the house after I had my 1st son I'd be about $10,000/year ahead in current salary, have about $30,000 more in employer- contributed retirement, not to mention our family would be $200,000 or so ahead financially (my salary - roughly- times 7 minus full-time child care for both kiddos). Thinking about all that makes me literally sick to my stomach -- I try not to.
At the same time I was able to do a lot for my family. $200,000 worth? I'd hope so!
Our current goal is for me to retire in 2008...

PermalinkPermalink 04/04/07 @ 07:56
Comment from: AdrienneBashista [Member] Email
Oh - and one thing that's important about the financial side of the equation - SAH moms MUST HAVE life insurance and also disability. Your husband/partner needs to be insured to the gills and you need to be insured too. If your partner dies or becomes incapacitated you need to think about your earning potential: if it's not the same as his/hers (minus childcare) then it's time to get worried...
PermalinkPermalink 04/04/07 @ 07:58
Comment from: AdrienneBashista [Member] Email
Some days I miss the blogging...
PermalinkPermalink 04/04/07 @ 07:59
Comment from: Sandra Hanks Benoiton [Member] Email · http://international.adoptionblogs.com/
Hey, look everyone! It's former Russian adoption blogger Adrienne!

Great to hear from you, Adrienne. You just HAD to do the math, didn't you? Silly girl ...

PermalinkPermalink 04/04/07 @ 08:46
Comment from: nicegirlphd [Member] Email
but why is the debate always about mothers and not fathers? Why aren't the men / husbands scolded for their choice of expensive coffee and lots of money over the well-being of their children? (no, I don't really view the choice this way, but this is the way the choice is often portrayed for women, who subsequently often feel guilty for working out of home).
PermalinkPermalink 04/04/07 @ 19:15
Comment from: Sandra Hanks Benoiton [Member] Email · http://international.adoptionblogs.com/
nicegirlphd,
That's exactly the point behind the orgainizing!
PermalinkPermalink 04/05/07 @ 01:11
Comment from: s [Member] Email
Cool set of posts, Sandra. So my 2 cents: for me, staying home has been a very liberating and powerful decision. At the time our first child was born, I was earning more than my husband was. However, he was supportive of my decision either way. The key for me was that it was MY decision. Another big factor for me is the knowledge that I can reenter my career at any point and support myself and the children if I need or decide to. And though I consider myself to be a SAHM, I have somehow always worked, though out of my "career", since becoming a mother. Part-time out of the home, working from home, working under grants - all of these things have allowed me to earn without requiring daycare. I also feel that I have continued to gain experience that will be useful to me in a professional sense from the various boards I have served on and from other volunteer endeavors.

I guess I'm trying to say that being a "SAHM" doesn't have to mean an utter end to using your brain and qualifications. However, I am very thankful that I have a college-education and work experience under my belt. Those 2 things are about the best "insurance" policy that I could have (-:
PermalinkPermalink 04/05/07 @ 15:22
Comment from: Sandra Hanks Benoiton [Member] Email · http://international.adoptionblogs.com/
s,
Thanks, and good points.

Working at home ... or 'juggling twenty chainsaws at the same time', as I call it ... is the option I've taken, too.
PermalinkPermalink 04/05/07 @ 22:36
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Adopt Help Adopt Help Adopt Help

Misc

Subscribe to Older Parent Adoption Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Julie
  • Guest Users: 198